
And yet Chelsea, having won just one of their last six Premier League matches, is in a bit of trouble. Chelsea’s attacking lines are chaotic and improvised, their interplay in the final third based on instinctive connections between players and total creative freedom.
Editors’ Picks
- How NFF, Caf, Fifa celebrated former Everton star Amokachi at 48
- Osayi-Samuel suffers racial abuse on social media after QPR draw against Norwich City
- Bailly delighted as Manchester United end 2020 with a victory
- Why Ndidi missed Crystal Palace clash – Leicester City boss Rodgers reveals
That should be perfect for pandemic football, and indeed there is plenty of time for Chelsea to surge back up the table and challenge for the title. But for now, as new signings Timo Werner and Kai Havertz struggle to settle, it is looking like a clear hindrance to the two poster boys of Chelsea’s recent poor form.
Werner has been consistently deployed on the left-wing at Chelsea, a position in which he was picked for a grand total of 337 minutes (three-and-a-half games) over the two years prior to his arrival at Stamford Bridge. For most of his time at RB Leipzig, Werner was either one of two strikers in a 3-5-2 or the left inside-forward in a 3-4-2-1, and in both cases his primary role was to drop intelligently into the left half-space, essentially leaning left into the No.10 zone to play incisive, one-touch football.
It might sound like splitting hairs to suggest a left-wing position at Chelsea is so different, but under Lampard, Werner is occupying an entirely different zone of the pitch – and in a wildly different overall system defined by the creative freedom, rather than ruthlessly-structured automatisms coached by Julian Nagelsmann at Leipzig.
Perhaps Werner should be adapting faster, and perhaps in time, he will become a valuable runner on Chelsea’s left. But it should worry Chelsea fans that the German is playing as if he is not receiving detailed instruction about his new position – which follows the pattern of Lampard’s time at Chelsea. Havertz is another example of a new player who looks like he is craving the tactical attention to detail he received in Germany, in his case under Peter Bosz at Bayer Leverkusen.
Even before that recent conversion, Havertz was deployed as a No.10 or inside right-winger, and, like Werner, he benefited from playing in a counter-pressing system that saw Leverkusen pouring forward in numbers and playing quick, one-touch, on-the-turn football.

Even if he did have the tactical ability as a manager to convert Havertz into a central midfielder (and there is indeed still time for Lampard to prove he does), it is very difficult to understand the motivation for signing one of the world’s most promising young players and stripping him of both his best attributes and years of world-class coaching. It is hard enough adapting to a new country and a new system. It is nearly impossible to do so while being played completely out of position.
However, Lampard needs his plans to start working over the next couple of months, because there is no shortage of managers who have precisely the tactical skills to bring the best out of Werner and Havertz, from Leipzig’s Nagelsmann to Southampton boss Ralph Hasenhuttl.
Deploying Werner and Havertz in their strongest positions would be a start. But if Lampard really does want these two players to undo their coaching in Germany and retrain in new roles, well, we need to start seeing some evidence the Chelsea manager and his staff possess the tactical capacities to help them do so.